Of course, there are no polar bears anywhere close to the North Pole. Also, there are no houses at the North Pole and nobody lives there except in submarines. Indeed, there is no land there. It is frozen ocean. Thus, logic involves a lot more than a few cherry-picked facts.
As to Walt Brown's "Hydroplate Theory", there's good reasons why even the major Young Earth Creationist ministries (and even various of the people honored on this website) reject his pseudoscience. The biggest reason is that Brown apparently flunked high school physics and never calculated the heat production that would have vaporized the flood waters and boiled them right off the planet.
For a few dozen major reasons why no physicists, whether Christian or non-Christian, have any respect for Brown's nonsense, you could start with this summary:
1 Comment
Submitted by Professor-Tertius (not verified) on
Of course, there are no polar bears anywhere close to the North Pole. Also, there are no houses at the North Pole and nobody lives there except in submarines. Indeed, there is no land there. It is frozen ocean. Thus, logic involves a lot more than a few cherry-picked facts.
As to Walt Brown's "Hydroplate Theory", there's good reasons why even the major Young Earth Creationist ministries (and even various of the people honored on this website) reject his pseudoscience. The biggest reason is that Brown apparently flunked high school physics and never calculated the heat production that would have vaporized the flood waters and boiled them right off the planet.
For a few dozen major reasons why no physicists, whether Christian or non-Christian, have any respect for Brown's nonsense, you could start with this summary:
http://paleo.cc/ce/wbrown.htm