Actually Bill Nye destroyed Ham in the debate. Ham had no evidence for his claims and had to keep coming up with silly excuses like the lifespans of creatures and all physical laws being totally different for the past right up till humans were capable of tracking such things.
The vast majority of watches conceded the win to Nye when Ham said that there was no evidence possible that would change his mind. That proved Ham has just been brainwashed to the extent that all reason has fled his mind and that he cannot be considered a scientist in any way at all.
Except the evidence Nye presented, was a mere repetition of propositions that remain more asserted than proved. Ken Ham was not the man to challenge Nye properly.
7 Comments
Submitted by TheDiggPatriots (not verified) on
The year 2014 saw great strides in understanding the creation of the world, and how the Flood created confusion... http://t.co/UfWxqYZsxw
Submitted by ConservNewsView (not verified) on
The year 2014 saw great strides in understanding the creation of the world, and how the Flood created confusion... http://t.co/AcgepTZxMW
Submitted by MysaviorYeshua (not verified) on
RT @Creationtips: Creation science created a scene in 2014. (Hall of Fame) | http://t.co/GFyZabkh1p
Submitted by Creationtips (not verified) on
Creation science created a scene in 2014. (Hall of Fame) | http://t.co/GFyZabkh1p
Submitted by creation61 (not verified) on
Evolution is a Religion We created a scene in 2014 http://t.co/8BHtAzHzBl
Submitted by Jonathan V (not verified) on
Actually Bill Nye destroyed Ham in the debate. Ham had no evidence for his claims and had to keep coming up with silly excuses like the lifespans of creatures and all physical laws being totally different for the past right up till humans were capable of tracking such things.
The vast majority of watches conceded the win to Nye when Ham said that there was no evidence possible that would change his mind. That proved Ham has just been brainwashed to the extent that all reason has fled his mind and that he cannot be considered a scientist in any way at all.
Submitted by Temlakos on
Except the evidence Nye presented, was a mere repetition of propositions that remain more asserted than proved. Ken Ham was not the man to challenge Nye properly.